BMW 3 series 2000 vs Rover 200 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW 3 series is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Rover 200 is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| BMW 3 series is available with rear wheel drive, while Rover 200 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.4 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 231 HP | 103 - 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 300 NM | 127 - 138 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 11 seconds | 8.9 - 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 10.0 | 7.1 - 8.5 | |
|
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Rover 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.39 m | |
|
BMW 3 series is larger, but slightly lower. BMW 3 series is 27 cm longer than the Rover 200, 8 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
300 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.2 metres less than that of the Rover 200. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`949 | ~ 1`565 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Rover 200 has
| |