BMW 3 series 2000 vs Mercedes CLK 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 231 HP | 136 - 347 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 300 NM | 190 - 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 11 seconds | 6.2 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 10.0 | 9.4 - 12.2 | |
|
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.38 m | |
| BMW 3 series is 8 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, 4 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
300 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLK, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`949 | ~ 2`031 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |