BMW 3 series 2000 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 231 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 300 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 11 seconds | 8.5 - 8.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 10.0 | 11.7 - 12.4 | |
|
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.30 m | |
|
BMW 3 series is smaller, but higher. BMW 3 series is 42 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 12 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
300 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1.6 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Camaro, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`949 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |