BMW 3 series 2000 vs BMW Z3 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.8 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 231 HP | 115 - 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 300 NM | 168 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 11 seconds | 6 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 10.0 | 7.8 - 10.6 | |
|
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW Z3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.29 m | |
|
BMW 3 series is larger. BMW 3 series is 45 cm longer than the BMW Z3, 3 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 165 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
300 litres | no data | |
|
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity. BMW 3 series has 135 litres more trunk space than the BMW Z3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`949 kg | ~ 1`501 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`623 kg | ~ 1`257 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 326 kg | ~ 244 kg | |
| BMW 3 series load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem more than BMW Z3. Therefore, BMW 3 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
BMW Z3 has
| |