BMW 3 series 1986 vs Toyota Celica 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW 3 series is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Toyota Celica is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| BMW 3 series is available with rear wheel drive, while Toyota Celica can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 - 170 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 - 226 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 13 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 9.9 | 8.0 | |
|
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Celica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.32 m | |
|
BMW 3 series is smaller, but higher. BMW 3 series is 17 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 6 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 312 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`676 | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |