BMW 3 series 2006 vs Honda CR-V 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW 3 series is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW 3 series also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 - 306 HP | 140 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 580 NM | 192 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 8.9 seconds | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 9.9 | 6.5 - 9.5 | |
|
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, BMW 3 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.68 m | |
| BMW 3 series is 6 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 28 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 955 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW 3 series has 116 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the BMW 3 series uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`998 | ~ 2`105 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 5600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |