BMW 3 series 2003 vs BMW 5 series 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 231 HP | 136 - 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 410 NM | 210 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 10 seconds | 6.2 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 9.6 | 5.9 - 12.2 | |
|
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW 5 series. On average, BMW 3 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.44 m | |
|
BMW 3 series is smaller. BMW 3 series is 29 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, 4 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 460 litres | |
|
BMW 5 series has more luggage space. BMW 3 series has 50 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1.3 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`935 | ~ 2`106 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 2800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |