BMW 3 series 2003 vs Mercedes CLK 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.8 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 231 HP | 163 - 367 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 410 NM | 240 - 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 10 seconds | 5.2 - 9.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 9.6 | 6.7 - 12.8 | |
|
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK. On average, BMW 3 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.41 m | |
| BMW 3 series is 15 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, 2 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 435 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLK has more luggage space. BMW 3 series has 25 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLK, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`935 | ~ 2`062 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |