BMW 3 series 1999 vs Mercedes CLK 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 231 HP | 136 - 347 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 300 NM | 190 - 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 12 seconds | 5.4 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 10.0 | 9.3 - 11.7 | |
|
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.37 m | |
| BMW 3 series is 8 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 420 litres | |
| BMW 3 series has 10 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLK, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`878 | ~ 1`869 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |