BMW 3 series 1999 vs Mazda 3 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
BMW 3 series is available with rear wheel drive, while Mazda 3 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.8 - 3.0 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 - 231 HP | 100 - 187 HP | |
Torque: | 175 - 300 NM | 144 - 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 12 seconds | 8.1 - 13.6 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 10.0 | 4.1 - 7.6 | |
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.47 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.45 m | |
BMW 3 series is 2 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 3 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 364 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1263 litres | |
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity. BMW 3 series has 46 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`878 | ~ 1`864 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 2400 | 7600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |