BMW 3 series 1992 vs Volvo V60 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 3 series
1992 - 1999
Volvo V60
2013 - 2018
Body: CoupeEstate car / wagon
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW 3 series is available only with rear wheel drive, while Volvo V60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.6 - 2.8 (petrol)1.5 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel)
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volvo V60 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types.

Performance

Power: 102 - 193 HP115 - 367 HP
Torque: 150 - 280 NM220 - 500 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 - 14 seconds4.8 - 12.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.7 - 10.03.8 - 10.2
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 110 - 145 mm (4.3 - 5.7 inches)136 mm (5.4 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo V60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.63 m
Width: 1.71 m1.85 m
Height: 1.37 m1.48 m
BMW 3 series is smaller.
BMW 3 series is 20 cm shorter than the Volvo V60, 14 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 11 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 435 litres430 litres
BMW 3 series has 5 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60.
Turning diameter: 10 meters13.6 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 3.6 metres less than that of the Volvo V60, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`762~ 2`168
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

average
Average price (€): 340012 200
Rating in user reviews: 7.1/10 9.3/10
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • only petrol engines available
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volvo V60 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • higher ground clearance
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv