BMW 3 series 1992 vs Honda Civic 1996

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 3 series
1992 - 1999
Honda Civic
1996 - 2001
Body: CoupeSedan
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
BMW 3 series is available with rear wheel drive, while Honda Civic can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.6 - 2.81.4 - 1.6

Performance

Power: 102 - 193 HP90 - 160 HP
Torque: 150 - 280 NM124 - 153 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 - 14 seconds8.1 - 13.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.7 - 10.06.8 - 8.4
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.46 m
Width: 1.71 m1.70 m
Height: 1.37 m1.39 m
Both cars are similar in size. BMW 3 series is 3 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 1 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 435 litres410 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, BMW 3 series has 25 litres more trunk space than the Honda Civic. The Honda Civic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`762~ 1`594
Safety:
Quality:
low

above average
Average price (€): 3000800
Rating in user reviews: 7.1/10 9.0/10
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • roomier boot
Honda Civic has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv