BMW 3 series 1992 vs Honda Civic 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
BMW 3 series is available with rear wheel drive, while Honda Civic can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.8 | 1.4 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 102 - 193 HP | 90 - 160 HP | |
Torque: | 150 - 280 NM | 124 - 153 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 14 seconds | 8.1 - 13.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 10.0 | 6.8 - 8.4 | |
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.43 m | 4.46 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.39 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. BMW 3 series is 3 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 1 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 410 litres | |
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, BMW 3 series has 25 litres more trunk space than the Honda Civic. The Honda Civic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`762 | ~ 1`594 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Average price (€): | 3400 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.1/10 | 9.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Honda Civic has
| |