BMW 3 series 1992 vs Ford Mustang 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.8 | 3.8 - 4.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 - 193 HP | 147 - 305 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 280 NM | 292 - 407 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 14 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 10.0 | 9.3 - 11.3 | |
|
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mustang. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.34 m | |
|
BMW 3 series is smaller, but slightly higher. BMW 3 series is 19 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 11 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1.7 metres less than that of the Ford Mustang, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`762 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
| |