BMW 3 series 1992 vs Audi TT 1998

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 3 series
1992 - 1999
Audi TT
1998 - 2006
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW 3 series is available only with rear wheel drive, while Audi TT can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.6 - 2.81.8 - 3.2

Performance

Power: 102 - 193 HP150 - 250 HP
Torque: 150 - 280 NM210 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 - 14 seconds6.2 - 8.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.7 - 10.08.1 - 11.0
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi TT.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.04 m
Width: 1.71 m1.76 m
Height: 1.37 m1.35 m
BMW 3 series is 39 cm longer than the Audi TT, 5 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 435 litres270 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity.
BMW 3 series has 165 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`762~ 1`748
Safety:
Quality:
low

above average
Average price (€): 36004800
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Audi TT has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv