BMW 3 series 1993 vs Volvo S40 1995

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 3 series
1993 - 2000
Volvo S40
1995 - 2000
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
BMW 3 series is available with rear wheel drive, while Volvo S40 can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.6 - 2.51.6 - 1.9

Performance

Power: 90 - 170 HP90 - 200 HP
Torque: 150 - 245 NM143 - 300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 - 14 seconds7.3 - 13 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.4 - 10.05.6 - 9.7
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S40. On average, BMW 3 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.21 m4.48 m
Width: 1.70 m1.72 m
Height: 1.39 m1.41 m
BMW 3 series is smaller.
BMW 3 series is 27 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 2 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 325 litres471 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1030 litres853 litres
BMW 3 series has 146 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 3 series (by 177 litres).
Turning diameter: 10 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`676~ 1`756
Safety:
Quality:
low

average
Average price (€): 2000600
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 7.1/10
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • better manoeuvrability
Volvo S40 has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv