BMW 3 series 1993 vs Mazda 323 1998

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 3 series
1993 - 2000
Mazda 323
1998 - 2001
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
BMW 3 series is available with rear wheel drive, while Mazda 323 can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.6 - 2.51.3 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 90 - 170 HP72 - 114 HP
Torque: 150 - 245 NM108 - 220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 - 14 seconds9.8 - 16.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.4 - 10.05.1 - 9.0
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 323. On average, BMW 3 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.21 m4.20 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.39 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. BMW 3 series is 1 cm longer than the Mazda 323, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 3 series is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 325 litres355 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1030 litres1000 litres
Despite its longer length, BMW 3 series has 30 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 323. This could mean that the BMW 3 series uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 3 series (by 30 litres).
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda 323, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`676~ 1`649
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

above average
Average price (€): 2000600
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda 323 has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • roomier boot
    • fewer faults
    • higher ratings in user reviews
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv