BMW 3 series 2001 vs Volvo S40 2002

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 3 series
2001 - 2005
Volvo S40
2002 - 2004
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
BMW 3 series is available with rear wheel drive, while Volvo S40 can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.8 - 2.51.6 - 1.9

Performance

Power: 115 - 192 HP102 - 200 HP
Torque: 175 - 330 NM145 - 300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.1 - 12 seconds7.3 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.5 - 9.55.4 - 10.0
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S40. On average, BMW 3 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.26 m4.48 m
Width: 1.75 m1.72 m
Height: 1.41 m1.41 m
BMW 3 series is 22 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 310 litres471 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1100 litres853 litres
BMW 3 series has 161 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 3 series (by 247 litres).
Turning diameter: 10 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`874~ 1`768
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): 20001200
Rating in user reviews: 7.9/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • better manoeuvrability
Volvo S40 has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv