BMW 3 series 2015 vs BMW 5 series 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

	BMW 3 series 2015 - 2018	BMW 5 series 2013 - 2016
Gearbox:	Manual/Automatic	Manual/Automatic
Engines:	1.5 - 3.0	2.0 - 4.4
Performance
Power:	116 - 326 HP	143 - 560 HP
Torque:	220 - 630 NM	270 - 740 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	4.8 - 10.7 seconds	4.4 - 9.7 seconds
	Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	4.4 - 7.3	4.5 - 9.9
	BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW 5 series. On average, BMW 3 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Ground clearance:	127 - 145 mm (5 - 5.7 inches)	131 - 141 mm (5.2 - 5.6 inches)
Dimensions
Length:	4.63 m	4.91 m
Width:	1.81 m	1.86 m
Height:	1.43 m	1.46 m
	BMW 3 series is smaller. BMW 3 series is 27 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, 5 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:	480 litres	520 litres
	BMW 5 series has more luggage space. BMW 3 series has 40 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series.
Turning diameter:	11.7 meters	12.6 meters
	The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.9 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg):	~ 2`064	~ 2`309

Safety:	no data	no data
Quality:	below average	below average
Average price (€):	23 200	15 200
Pros and Cons:	BMW 3 sērija has lower fuel consumption better manoeuvrability fewer faults	BMW 5 sērija has roomier boot lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

BMW 3 series 2015 vs BMW 5 series 2013

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions