BMW 3 series 2015 vs Mercedes C class 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

	BMW 3 series 2015 - 2018	Mercedes C class 2013 -
Gearbox:	Manual/Automatic	Manual/Automatic
Engines:	1.5 - 3.0	1.6 - 4.0
Performance
Power:	116 - 326 HP	156 - 510 HP
Torque:	220 - 630 NM	250 - 700 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	4.8 - 10.7 seconds	4 - 8.5 seconds
	Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	4.4 - 7.3	4.0 - 8.2
	BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes C class. On average, BMW 3 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions
Length:	4.63 m	4.69 m
Width:	1.81 m	1.81 m
Height:	1.43 m	1.44 m
	Both cars are similar in size. BMW 3 series is 5 cm shorter than the Mercedes C class, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 3 series is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:	480 litres	480 litres
Turning diameter:	11.7 meters	11.22 meters
	The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.48 metres more than that of the Mercedes C class, which means BMW 3 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg):	~ 2`064	~ 2`089

Safety:	no data
Quality:	below average	high
Average price (€):	23 000	25 600
Pros and Cons:	BMW 3 sērija has lower price	Mercedes C klase has fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

BMW 3 series 2015 vs Mercedes C class 2013

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions