BMW 3 series 2008 vs Volvo S60 2010

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 3 series
2008 - 2012
Volvo S60
2010 - 2013
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW 3 series is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo S60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW 3 series also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 1.6 - 3.01.6 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 122 - 306 HP115 - 304 HP
Torque: 160 - 580 NM240 - 440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.5 - 11.9 seconds6.5 - 10.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.7 - 9.74.3 - 9.9
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S60. On average, BMW 3 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.53 m4.63 m
Width: 1.82 m1.87 m
Height: 1.42 m1.48 m
BMW 3 series is smaller.
BMW 3 series is 10 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres380 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, BMW 3 series has 80 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo S60.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`023~ 2`089
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 58007400
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv