BMW 3 series 1998 vs Volvo S60 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
BMW 3 series is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo S60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW 3 series also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 1.9 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 - 231 HP | 130 - 300 HP | |
Torque: | 165 - 390 NM | 192 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 14 seconds | 5.7 - 12 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 10.0 | 6.5 - 13.0 | |
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S60. On average, BMW 3 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.47 m | 4.58 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
BMW 3 series is smaller. BMW 3 series is 11 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 424 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1034 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, BMW 3 series has 16 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 13 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 3 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`936 | ~ 2`030 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | above average | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 8.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |