BMW 3 series 1998 vs Volvo S60 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 3 series
1998 - 2001
Volvo S60
2000 - 2004
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW 3 series is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo S60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW 3 series also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 1.9 - 3.02.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 105 - 231 HP130 - 300 HP
Torque: 165 - 390 NM192 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.5 - 14 seconds5.7 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.7 - 10.06.5 - 13.0
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S60. On average, BMW 3 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.47 m4.58 m
Width: 1.74 m1.80 m
Height: 1.42 m1.43 m
BMW 3 series is smaller.
BMW 3 series is 11 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 440 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
Even though the car is shorter, BMW 3 series has 16 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10 meters13 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 3 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`936~ 2`030
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

above average
Average price (€): 20001400
Rating in user reviews: 7.5/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • better manoeuvrability
Volvo S60 has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv