BMW 3 series 1991 vs Audi 80 1990

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 3 series
1991 - 1998
Audi 80
1990 - 1995
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW 3 series is available only with rear wheel drive, while Audi 80 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.6 - 2.81.6 - 2.8

Performance

Power: 90 - 193 HP70 - 174 HP
Torque: 141 - 280 NM118 - 250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 - 15 seconds8 - 17.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.5 - 10.05.2 - 10.3
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi 80. On average, BMW 3 series equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 110 - 145 mm (4.3 - 5.7 inches)110 - 135 mm (4.3 - 5.3 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.48 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.39 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. BMW 3 series is 5 cm shorter than the Audi 80, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 435 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1200 litres710 litres
BMW 3 series has 5 litres more trunk space than the Audi 80. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 3 series (by 490 litres).
Turning diameter: 10 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1.2 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`755~ 1`745
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

below average
Average price (€): 2600800
Rating in user reviews: 7.2/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • better manoeuvrability
Audi 80 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv