BMW 3 series 1983 vs Ford Sierra 1990

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 3 series
1983 - 1991
Ford Sierra
1990 - 1993
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.71.6 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 86 - 170 HP71 - 220 HP
Torque: 140 - 230 NM119 - 290 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.3 - 18 seconds6.9 - 16.4 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.9 - 10.06.4 - 10.6
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Sierra. On average, BMW 3 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.32 m4.47 m
Width: 1.64 m1.70 m
Height: 1.38 m1.41 m
BMW 3 series is smaller.
BMW 3 series is 15 cm shorter than the Ford Sierra, 6 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 425 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
425 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1 metres more than that of the Ford Sierra, which means BMW 3 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`610~ 1`193
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 42001800
Pros and Cons:
    Ford Sierra has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • better manoeuvrability
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv