BMW 3 series 2015 vs BMW 5 series 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 3 series
2015 - 2018
BMW 5 series
2013 - 2017
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol)2.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 136 - 252 HP143 - 450 HP
Torque: 220 - 350 NM270 - 740 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.9 - 9.3 seconds4.7 - 10.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.3 - 6.84.8 - 8.8
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW 5 series.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.91 m
Width: 1.81 m1.86 m
Height: 1.43 m1.46 m
BMW 3 series is smaller.
BMW 3 series is 27 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, 5 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 495 litres560 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1670 litres
BMW 5 series has more luggage space.
BMW 3 series has 65 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series.
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters12.1 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`128~ 2`432
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 16 60017 200
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
BMW 5 sērija has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv