BMW 3 series 2012 vs Volkswagen Golf 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 3 series
2012 - 2015
Volkswagen Golf
2012 - 2017
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW 3 series is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volkswagen Golf can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW 3 series also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 1.6 - 3.01.0 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 116 - 313 HP85 - 184 HP
Torque: 220 - 630 NM160 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.9 - 11.2 seconds7.9 - 12.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.3 - 8.13.9 - 5.3
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Golf. On average, BMW 3 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 127 - 145 mm (5 - 5.7 inches)131 - 140 mm (5.2 - 5.5 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.62 m4.56 m
Width: 1.81 m1.80 m
Height: 1.43 m1.48 m
BMW 3 series is larger, but lower.
BMW 3 series is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 1 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 495 litres605 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1500 litres1620 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, BMW 3 series has 110 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. This could mean that the BMW 3 series uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 120 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.8 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Golf, which means BMW 3 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`093~ 1`917
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 10 2009600
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • also available in 2WD
Volkswagen Golf has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv