BMW 3 series 2012 vs Volvo V60 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 3 series
2012 - 2015
Volvo V60
2013 - 2018
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW 3 series is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo V60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW 3 series also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 1.6 - 3.01.5 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 116 - 313 HP115 - 367 HP
Torque: 220 - 630 NM220 - 500 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.9 - 11.2 seconds4.8 - 12.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.3 - 8.13.8 - 10.2
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V60. On average, BMW 3 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 127 - 145 mm (5 - 5.7 inches)136 mm (5.4 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.62 m4.63 m
Width: 1.81 m1.85 m
Height: 1.43 m1.48 m
BMW 3 series is smaller.
BMW 3 series and Volvo V60 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 495 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1500 litresno data
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity.
BMW 3 series has 65 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60.
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters13.6 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1.9 metres less than that of the Volvo V60, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`093~ 2`168
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 10 00013 400
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volvo V60 has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv