BMW 3 series 2012 vs Skoda Octavia 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 3 series
2012 - 2015
Skoda Octavia
2013 - 2017
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW 3 series is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Skoda Octavia can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW 3 series also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 1.6 - 3.01.0 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 116 - 313 HP105 - 220 HP
Torque: 220 - 630 NM175 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.9 - 11.2 seconds6.9 - 11.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.3 - 8.13.8 - 6.7
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Octavia. On average, BMW 3 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.62 m4.66 m
Width: 1.81 m1.81 m
Height: 1.43 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. BMW 3 series is 4 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 3 series is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 495 litres610 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1500 litres1740 litres
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space.
BMW 3 series has 115 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 240 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.6 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means BMW 3 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`093~ 1`891
Safety:
BMW 3 series scores higher in safety tests. The BMW 3 series scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
average

below average
Average price (€): 10 2009200
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • also available in 2WD
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
Skoda Octavia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv