BMW 3 series 2008 vs Volvo V50 2007

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 3 series
2008 - 2012
Volvo V50
2007 - 2012
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW 3 series is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo V50 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW 3 series also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 1.6 - 3.01.6 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 122 - 306 HP100 - 230 HP
Torque: 160 - 580 NM150 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.6 - 11 seconds6.9 - 12.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.8 - 9.85.0 - 10.1
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V50. On average, BMW 3 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.53 m4.52 m
Width: 1.82 m1.78 m
Height: 1.44 m1.46 m
BMW 3 series is larger, but slightly lower.
BMW 3 series is 1 cm longer than the Volvo V50, 5 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres417 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1385 litresno data
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity.
BMW 3 series has 43 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volvo V50, which means BMW 3 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`116~ 1`943
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 58003600
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 6.0/10
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Volvo V50 has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv