BMW 2 series 2013 vs Mini Cooper S 2013
| Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
|
Mini Cooper S is a more dynamic driving. BMW 2 series engine produces 8 HP less power than Mini Cooper S, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Mini Cooper S. Due to the lower power, BMW 2 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mini Cooper S is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 2 series consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper S, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 2 series could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 2 series consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper S. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 44 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 2 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mini Cooper S) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 2 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mini Cooper S engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X1 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| BMW 2 sērija 2013 2.0 engine: Until 2015, engines used to have problems with the timing chain guides, which have been resolved over time. Other problems with this engine are the oil pump performance and its drive chain, as well as cracking ... More about BMW 2 sērija 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
|
BMW 2 series is larger, but slightly lower. BMW 2 series is 58 cm longer than the Mini Cooper S, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 211 litres | |
|
BMW 2 series has more luggage capacity. BMW 2 series has 69 litres more trunk space than the Mini Cooper S. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 2 series is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mini Cooper S. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 800 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 2 sērija has
|
Mini Cooper S has
| |