BMW 2 series 2013 vs Mazda 3 2014

 
BMW 2 series
2013 - 2017
Mazda 3
2014 - 2016
Body: CabrioSedan
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.2 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 190 HP150 HP
Torque: 400 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.5 seconds8 seconds
BMW 2 series is more dynamic to drive.
BMW 2 series engine produces 40 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power BMW 2 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.43.9
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
BMW 2 series consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 2 series could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1180 km in combined cycle1300 km in combined cycle
1360 km on highway1450 km on highway
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda 3) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 2 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.
Ground clearance: 140 mm (5.5 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 3 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 330'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 11 years12 years
Engine spread: Used also on BMW X1Used also on Mazda 6, Mazda CX-5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
BMW 2 sērija 2013 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ...  More about BMW 2 sērija 2013 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.59 m
Width: 1.77 m1.80 m
Height: 1.42 m1.45 m
BMW 2 series is smaller.
BMW 2 series is 15 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 2 series is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 280 litres419 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
335 litresno data
Mazda 3 has more luggage space.
BMW 2 series has 139 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 2 series is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 3.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0051`910
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

average
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 2 series has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 26 00011 600
Pros and Cons: BMW 2 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv