BMW 2 series 2013 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 6.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 405 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 556 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| BMW 2 series engine produces 215 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 156 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | no data | |
| BMW 2 sērija 2013 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW 2 sērija 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
|
BMW 2 series is smaller, but slightly higher. BMW 2 series is 40 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 14 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 2 series is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
335 litres | no data | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage space. BMW 2 series has 40 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 2 series is 0.6 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Camaro, which means BMW 2 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`025 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 000 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 2 sērija has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |