BMW 2 series 2018 vs Skoda Karoq 2019
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 178 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Skoda Karoq is a more dynamic driving. BMW 2 series engine produces 12 HP less power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Skoda Karoq. Due to the lower power, BMW 2 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.9 | |
| BMW 2 series consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that by driving the BMW 2 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Karoq can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| BMW 2 sērija 2018 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW 2 sērija 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| BMW 2 series is 19 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 645 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1905 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
BMW 2 series has more luggage capacity. BMW 2 series has 124 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 2 series (by 275 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 2 series is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means BMW 2 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`140 kg | 2`213 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`495 kg | 1`480 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 645 kg | 733 kg | |
| BMW 2 series load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Skoda Karoq. Therefore, Skoda Karoq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| BMW 2 series scores higher in safety tests, but Skoda Karoq is better rated in child safety tests. The BMW 2 series scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 2 sērija has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |