BMW 2 series 2015 vs Ford C-Max 2014
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 120 HP | |
Torque: | 270 NM | 270 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
BMW 2 series engine produces 4 HP less power than Ford C-Max, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, BMW 2 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.4 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 55 litres | |
870 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW 2 series can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this BMW 2 series version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of BMW 2 series 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.56 m | 4.38 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.63 m | |
BMW 2 series is 18 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 3 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 2 series is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 645 litres | 432 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1905 litres | 1684 litres | |
BMW 2 series has more luggage capacity. BMW 2 series has 213 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 2 series (by 221 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 2 series is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means BMW 2 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | |||
BMW 2 series scores higher in safety tests, but Ford C-Max is better rated in child safety tests. The BMW 2 series scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 2 series has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 10 800 | 8200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 2 sērija has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |