BMW 2 series 2018 vs Dacia Dokker 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
BMW 2 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 2 series engine produces 95 HP more power than Dacia Dokker, whereas torque is 180 NM more than Dacia Dokker. Thanks to more power BMW 2 series reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Dokker is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 2 series consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Dokker, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 2 series could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 2 series consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Dokker. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Dacia Dokker gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
BMW 2 sērija has 4x4: This generation BMW features the Haldex Generation V proactive all-wheel-drive system, which sends 100% of torque to the front wheels as standard. The system analyzes data from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement if required. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split equally between the axles (50%/50%). | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW X2 | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Dokker might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The BMW 2 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW 2 sērija 2018 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW 2 sērija 2018 2.0 engine Dacia Dokker 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Dacia Dokker 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.81 m | |
| BMW 2 series and Dacia Dokker are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 645 litres | 800 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1905 litres | 3000 litres | |
|
Dacia Dokker has more luggage space. BMW 2 series has 155 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Dokker. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Dokker (by 1095 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 2 series is 0.6 metres more than that of the Dacia Dokker, which means BMW 2 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`280 kg | 1`899 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`615 kg | 1`368 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 665 kg | 531 kg | |
| BMW 2 series load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem more than Dacia Dokker. Therefore, BMW 2 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| BMW 2 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Dokker has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than BMW 2 series, so BMW 2 series quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 2 sērija has
|
Dacia Dokker has
| |