BMW 2 series 2018 vs Skoda Karoq 2017

 
BMW 2 series
2018 -
Skoda Karoq
2017 -
Body: Minivan / MPVCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 109 HP150 HP
Torque: 190 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.3 seconds8.4 seconds
Skoda Karoq is a more dynamic driving.
BMW 2 series engine produces 41 HP less power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Skoda Karoq. Due to the lower power, BMW 2 series reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.85.1
Real fuel consumption: 7.4 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW 2 series consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 2 series could require 105 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 2 series consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km330'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 12 years8 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 5 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X1, BMW 4 sērijaInstalled on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
BMW 2 sērija 2018 1.5 engine: The B38 1.5-liter three-cylinder petrol engine, introduced in 2013, was designed with a focus on fuel efficiency and low emissions to meet modern environmental standards. While it received generally positive ...  More about BMW 2 sērija 2018 1.5 engine 

Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ...  More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.35 m4.38 m
Width: 1.80 m1.84 m
Height: 1.56 m1.61 m
BMW 2 series is smaller.
BMW 2 series is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Karoq, 4 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 2 series is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 645 litres521 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1905 litresno data
BMW 2 series has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, BMW 2 series has 124 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. The Skoda Karoq may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11.7 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`055no data
Safety:
BMW 2 series scores higher in safety tests, but Skoda Karoq is better rated in child safety tests. The BMW 2 series scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 21 80023 200
Pros and Cons: BMW 2 sērija has
  • timing chain engine
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Skoda Karoq has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher children safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv