BMW 2 series 2019 vs Mercedes C class 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
|
Mercedes C class is a more dynamic driving. BMW 2 series engine produces 41 HP less power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Mercedes C class. Due to the lower power, BMW 2 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification BMW 2 series consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 2 series could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW 2 series consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes C class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (BMW 2 series) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes C class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| BMW 2 sērija 2019 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW 2 sērija 2019 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
BMW 2 series is smaller. BMW 2 series is 16 cm shorter than the Mercedes C class, 1 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 2 series is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Mercedes C class has more luggage space. BMW 2 series has 50 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes C class. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.22 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 2 series is 0.18 metres more than that of the Mercedes C class. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`195 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mercedes C class has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 2 series has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Mercedes C class, so Mercedes C class quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 26 600 | 25 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |