BMW 2 series 2019 vs Alfa Romeo Giulia 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo Giulia is a more dynamic driving. BMW 2 series engine produces 10 HP more power than Alfa Romeo Giulia, but torque is 50 NM less than Alfa Romeo Giulia. Despite the higher power, BMW 2 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Alfa Romeo Giulia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 2 series consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Giulia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 2 series could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 2 series consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Giulia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1380 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1650 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Alfa Romeo Giulia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (BMW 2 series) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Alfa Romeo Giulia) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| BMW 2 sērija 2019 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW 2 sērija 2019 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
|
BMW 2 series is smaller. BMW 2 series is 11 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo Giulia, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`445 | |
| Safety: | |||
| BMW 2 series is better rated in child safety tests. The BMW 2 series scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 600 | 29 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 2 sērija has
|
Alfa Romeo Giulia has
| |