BMW 2 series 2017 vs Audi TT 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 6.6 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. BMW 2 series engine produces 13 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, BMW 2 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification BMW 2 series consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the BMW 2 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW 2 series consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 2 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| BMW 2 sērija 2017 2.0 engine: Until 2015, engines used to have problems with the timing chain guides, which have been resolved over time. Other problems with this engine are the oil pump performance and its drive chain, as well as cracking ... More about BMW 2 sērija 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
| BMW 2 series is 24 cm longer than the Audi TT, 6 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 2 series is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 305 litres | |
|
BMW 2 series has more luggage capacity. BMW 2 series has 85 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`910 kg | 1`705 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`405 kg | 1`345 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 505 kg | 360 kg | |
| BMW 2 series load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem more than Audi TT. Therefore, BMW 2 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 2 series has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 18 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 2 sērija has
|
Audi TT has
| |