BMW 2 series 2013 vs Kia Cerato 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| BMW 2 series is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Kia Cerato can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 340 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 500 NM | 194 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 - 8.9 seconds | 8.5 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 8.1 | 6.9 - 7.2 | |
|
On average, the BMW 2 series petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Kia Cerato. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW 2 series is 7 cm shorter than the Kia Cerato, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 433 litres | |
|
Kia Cerato has more luggage space. BMW 2 series has 43 litres less trunk space than the Kia Cerato. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`923 | ~ 1`254 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 2 sērija has
|
Kia Cerato has
| |