Audi e-tron 2020 vs Volvo XC90 2019
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | Electric | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 503 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 973 NM | 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.5 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Audi e-tron is more dynamic to drive. Audi e-tron engine produces 268 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 493 NM more than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Audi e-tron reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 27.0 kWh/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 8.10 € | 14.20 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Electricity€/kWhDiesel€/l | |||
| Range per fill-up: | no data | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage from one tank of fuel or charge. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 172 mm (6.8 inches) | 223 mm (8.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Audi e-tron is smaller. Audi e-tron is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Audi e-tron is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 615 litres | 368 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1665 litres | 1868 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 203 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi e-tron is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`245 kg | 2`750 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 200 | 44 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi e-tron has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |