Audi e-tron 2020 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | Electric | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 503 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 973 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.5 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
Audi e-tron is more dynamic to drive. Audi e-tron engine produces 197 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 273 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Thanks to more power Audi e-tron reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 27.3 kWh/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 8.20 € | 13.40 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Electricity€/kWhDiesel€/l | |||
| Range per fill-up: | no data | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage from one tank of fuel or charge. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 172 mm (6.8 inches) | 278 mm (10.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.98 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.80 m | |
| Audi e-tron is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Audi e-tron is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 660 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 220 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 660 litres | 780 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1725 litres | 1686 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space (by 120 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi e-tron (by 39 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi e-tron is 0.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`245 kg | 3`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`620 kg | 2`178 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 625 kg | 1`022 kg | |
| Audi e-tron load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 64 procentiem less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 000 | 47 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi e-tron has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |