Audi TT 2003 vs Chrysler Crossfire 2004

 
Audi TT
2003 - 2006
Chrysler Crossfire
2004 - 2008
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.2 Petrol3.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 250 HP218 HP
Torque: 320 NM310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.4 seconds6.5 seconds
Audi TT engine produces 32 HP more power than Chrysler Crossfire, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Chrysler Crossfire. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.910.1
Real fuel consumption: 9.8 l/100km10.9 l/100km
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi TT consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Crossfire, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Crossfire.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle590 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway780 km on highway
630 km with real consumption550 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.04 m4.06 m
Width: 1.76 m1.77 m
Height: 1.35 m1.32 m
Both cars are similar in size. Audi TT is 2 cm shorter than the Chrysler Crossfire, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Audi TT is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 180 litres104 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data190 litres
Audi TT has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Audi TT has 76 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Crossfire. The Chrysler Crossfire may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.2 metres more than that of the Chrysler Crossfire.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8901`665
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 52008000
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv