Audi TT 2005 vs BMW Z3 1996

 
Audi TT
2005 - 2006
BMW Z3
1996 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 190 HP115 HP
Torque: 240 NM168 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.7 seconds10.5 seconds
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive.
Audi TT engine produces 75 HP more power than BMW Z3, whereas torque is 72 NM more than BMW Z3. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.57.8
The BMW Z3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi TT consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 255 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 56 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 580 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
730 km on highway860 km on highway
BMW Z3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.04 m4.02 m
Width: 1.76 m1.69 m
Height: 1.35 m1.29 m
Audi TT is larger.
Audi TT is 2 cm longer than the BMW Z3, 7 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 220 litres165 litres
Audi TT has more luggage capacity.
Audi TT has 55 litres more trunk space than the BMW Z3.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7651`410
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Audi TT has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW Z3 has serious deffects in 255 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 52006400
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW Z3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv