Audi TT 2005 vs BMW 3 series 2003

 
Audi TT
2005 - 2006
BMW 3 series
2003 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 190 HP143 HP
Torque: 240 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.7 seconds10 seconds
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive.
Audi TT engine produces 47 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 40 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.57.8
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi TT consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 255 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 56 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 580 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
730 km on highway1030 km on highway
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.04 m4.49 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.35 m1.37 m
Audi TT is 45 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi TT is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 220 litres260 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data300 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage space.
Audi TT has 40 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7651`925
Safety:
Quality:
high

low
Audi TT has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 50005800
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv