Audi TT 1999 vs BMW Z3 1996

 
Audi TT
1999 - 2005
BMW Z3
1996 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 225 HP115 HP
Torque: 280 NM168 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 seconds10.5 seconds
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive.
Audi TT engine produces 110 HP more power than BMW Z3, whereas torque is 112 NM more than BMW Z3. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.47.8
Real fuel consumption: 9.9 l/100km8.4 l/100km
The BMW Z3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi TT consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 240 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z3.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
870 km on highway860 km on highway
620 km with real consumption600 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.04 m4.02 m
Width: 1.76 m1.69 m
Height: 1.35 m1.29 m
Audi TT is larger.
Audi TT is 2 cm longer than the BMW Z3, 7 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 180 litres165 litres
Audi TT has 15 litres more trunk space than the BMW Z3.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8151`410
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): 48006400
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
BMW Z3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv