Audi TT 1999 vs BMW 3 series 2001
| Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 225 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive. Audi TT engine produces 109 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 105 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 375 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.41 m | |
| Audi TT is 22 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 1 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 310 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1100 litres | |
|
BMW 3 series has more luggage space. Audi TT has 130 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`815 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |