Audi TT 1999 vs BMW 3 series 2003

 
Audi TT
1999 - 2005
BMW 3 series
2003 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chain and beltTiming chain

Performance

Power: 180 HP143 HP
Torque: 235 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.2 seconds10 seconds
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive.
Audi TT engine produces 37 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 35 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.57.8
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi TT consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 255 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 56 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 580 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
730 km on highway1030 km on highway
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km380'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 5 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Seat Leon, Seat ToledoUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi TT might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.04 m4.49 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.35 m1.37 m
Audi TT is 45 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Audi TT is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 220 litres260 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data300 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage space.
Audi TT has 40 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7651`925
Safety:
Quality:
high

low
Audi TT has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 52005800
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv