Audi TT 1999 vs BMW 3 series 2001

 
Audi TT
1999 - 2005
BMW 3 series
2001 - 2005
Body: CabrioHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chain and beltTiming chain

Performance

Power: 180 HP116 HP
Torque: 235 NM175 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.2 seconds11 seconds
Audi TT is more dynamic to drive.
Audi TT engine produces 64 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 60 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.56.9
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Audi TT consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT could require 390 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 56 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 580 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
730 km on highway1180 km on highway
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi TT engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 5 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Seat Ibiza, Seat LeonUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi TT might be a better choice in this respect.
Audi TT 1999 1.8 engine: The engine is considered reliable, with a lifespan from 300,000 km. The primary causes of unstable operation include air leaks through the crankcase ventilation system, throttle body malfunctions, idle air ...  More about Audi TT 1999 1.8 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.04 m4.26 m
Width: 1.76 m1.75 m
Height: 1.35 m1.41 m
Audi TT is 22 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 1 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 220 litres310 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1100 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage space.
Audi TT has 90 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7651`800
Safety:
Quality:
high

low
Audi TT has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 48002400
Pros and Cons: Audi TT has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv