Audi TT 2002 vs Honda S2000 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 208 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
|
Honda S2000 is a more dynamic driving. Audi TT engine produces 60 HP less power than Honda S2000, but torque is 27 NM more than Honda S2000. Due to the lower power, Audi TT reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Audi TT consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda S2000, which means that by driving the Audi TT over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Audi TT consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda S2000. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 500 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 630 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 490 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Honda S2000) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.28 m | |
| Audi TT is 10 cm shorter than the Honda S2000, 1 cm wider, while the height of Audi TT is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda S2000, which means Audi TT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`680 | 1`220 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Honda S2000 has
| |