Audi TT 2002 vs Audi TT 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Audi TT 2010 is a more dynamic driving. Audi TT 2002 engine produces 10 HP less power than Audi TT 2010, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Audi TT 2010. Due to the lower power, Audi TT 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Audi TT 2002 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT 2010, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi TT 2002 could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi TT 2002 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT 2010. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi TT 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Audi TT 2002 1.8 engine: The weakest link in this engine is the turbine, whose failure is contributed to by a faulty catalytic converter. The oil pump and chain tensioner also tend to have problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Audi TT 2002 is smaller. Audi TT 2002 is 15 cm shorter than the Audi TT 2010, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 250 litres | |
|
Audi TT 2010 has more luggage space. Audi TT 2002 has 30 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT 2010. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Audi TT 2002 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Audi TT 2010, which means Audi TT 2002 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`635 | 1`605 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Audi TT 2010 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi TT 2002 has serious deffects in 485 percent more cases than Audi TT 2010, so Audi TT 2010 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 5000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Audi TT has
|
Audi TT has
| |